View Poll Results: Do you like WolfcamQL?
- 752. You may not vote on this poll
I Like WolfcamQL
I Dislike WolfcamQL
05-11-2013 01:31 PM
Your fx makes me very excited good job. I vote blurframes 1.
Originally Posted by HUK
05-11-2013 02:46 PM
Thanks, 1-15 blurframes no super smooth look, 20 blurframes is smootly but no all maps and bad blur for look, although a way to capture very fast (aviframerate 30, blurframes 20), like a real-time playback and takes up little space on your hard disk. While in search of a way to capture for ultra-smooth look in youtube with hadden blur. My config (aviframerate 120 bf 20 bo 60) is still not entirely happy.
Originally Posted by EARTH_QUAKE
I aspire to that - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u65C-b_Jt5M , but 300fps to 30, as in the description of this video, is not enough, there is secret for me.
Last edited by HUK; 05-11-2013 at 02:56 PM.
05-11-2013 03:37 PM
Xvid codec is better than the ripbot x64 for 30fps source(60fps youtube upload - ripbot is better imo), this video is 30fps source and xvid compression my settings on screenshoots(advanced settingsby default) (30fps 8bf) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cN0gi...ature=youtu.be. For comprare quality compressor my other video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...tRa7yrc#t=127s with ripbot x64 compression is equivalently source. If there is a more optimal way to compress for youtube, I would like to know.
Last edited by HUK; 05-11-2013 at 03:45 PM.
05-11-2013 07:19 PM
What about your mme_bluroverlap value? that has an impact on the way blurframes look as well.
Here's a tutorial on blurframes if you're interested:
05-14-2013 09:00 AM
Thanks for the link, but I had already read it and did not receive benefits.
Originally Posted by Mango
Hi all! My problem is described in this video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_XjAkY_K3k , sorry for the bad English and I hope that everything is clear.
05-15-2013 01:08 AM
I noticed in the video you have your bluroverlap set to 0.
Set it to 8 or more.
05-15-2013 09:12 AM
Thanks, but no help overlap.I've seen videos with perfect smooth without wolfcam`s blurring, which are recorded at 125fps,then what is the other trick that is in wolfcam cfg. Rotate frame rate in recording or sync, i am trying to solve the mystery but so far without success. I use many different config in internet, and popular anti or k..... at this forum but this no have this mystery trick. Many link to download of good config is not work in discription of smooth movies.
Last edited by HUK; 05-15-2013 at 09:35 AM.
05-15-2013 11:24 AM
I watched your video and honestly the smoothness was fine. You are always going to have to comprimise between firstly: Quality or file size and secondly sharpness or smoothness.
You're looking for the impossible, really. Video encoding can definitely improve the smoothness and sharness of a video for a given file size, but past that there can be little further improvement: remember sony vegas can only go up to 100fps and youtube 30fps - after that you've hit a brick wall in my opinion. By all means continue to experiment, but when I saw you'd tried 2880fps I laughed; you're wasting your time!
05-16-2013 03:59 AM
Thank you, but I'm still not sure what vegas maximum 100fps, because you can capture 30fps at timescale 0.1 and speed for 2 times in vegas. 1 times 30 x 3 = 90, second 90 x 3,33 times and thus to infinity. Here is a simple example where my problem is clearly visible:
I repeated the author of this video and just captured at 200fps without wolfcams blur and use vegas pro , but the result is not the same! - So this is a proof of tricks cfg - not known to me. I use aNtii - cfg and other "complete wolfcamql cfg" from this forum and many different cfg, but there are still no results.
On some map (for example: aerowalk, asylum, spidercrossing) video aviframerate 120 + blurframes median 20 + bluroverlap 60. after conversion to vegas pro at 30fps - super smooth, almost like the CoD and CSS, but in most of the map - not much more smoothly nervous.
Last edited by HUK; 05-16-2013 at 05:19 AM.
05-16-2013 10:04 AM
No idea what you're trying to say, sorry. I read somewhere that sony vegas pro 9 (version I have) can only support framerate 100fps, past that I imagine it removes frames systematically to maintain that. For example If you imported a 100fps video and sped it up 2x, half the frames would be removed. If you capture at timescale 0.1 you will still be recording at the same fps (in real terms, not in game terms), hence ten times more frames. So 30fps timescale 0.1 is equivalent in frames to 300fps timescale 1.
Originally Posted by HUK